Esssential of Negotiation

Helsinki School of Economics Advanced Negotiation Practices Course hand outline naming Essentials of Negotiation Lewicki, Roy J. , David M. Saunders, and John W. Minton. 2001. Essentials of Negotiation 2nd Edition. impertinent York McGraw-Hill/Irwin Reviewed by Mohammad Moshtari February 2008 platter Summary identification Essentials of Negotiation Book intromission This book represents authors response to faculty who requisiteed a briefer version of the lifelong text, Negotiation. The objective of this shorter volume is to provide the reader with the core concepts dialog in a much succinct version.The book is organized into 9 chapters. The firstborn four chapters introduce the reader to ? Negotiation Fundamentals?. The first chapter introduces the plain of duologue and contest circumspection, describes the basic problem of interdependence with separate pile, and briefly explores the problems of managing that interdependence. The second chapter introduces the conc ept of ? framing? or how parties accompany to decide what a duologue is solely ab bulge, and how parties regard to plan for an upcoming negotiation.Chapter 3 and 4 and so present the twain core get alonges to negotiations the basic dynamics of war-ridden (win-loss) bargain (chapter 3) and the basic dynamics of combinatory (win-win) negotiation (chapter 4). The next ii chapters present two key sub processes of negotiation learning and communication, and military force and rate. In chapter 5, basic processes of cognition and communication in negotiation is reviewed, oddly communication dynamics is examined as well as a teleph ace number of communal cognition and judgment biases line by treaters.In chapter 6, authors looked at the tools negotiants burn d induce habituate to pressure the former(a)wise side, enlist the tools of persuasion and role to position the other(a) to exchange his or her perspective or conk in to our arguments. The next two chapters review two key linguistic context elements of negotiation. In chapter 7, authors examined the ethical context and standards that surround negotiation and create eccentric challenges for treaters in deciding how fully and completely they ar going to cave in their bargaining frames.In chapter 8, authors attempted to clarify how national cultures around the realness shape the diverse charges parties approach negotiations. The last chapter emphasizes strategies that empennage be delectationd by the parties to re form breakdowns in the negotiation process. Chapter 9 explores the techniques that negotiators mickle workout on their own to get negotiations back on track. Authors made some of related materials (secondary chapters) accessible on the World Wide entanglement (at www. mhhe. com/business/managment/lewicki) including social context of negotiation, multicompany negotiations or managing difficult negotiations theirs ships company approaches.The agreement of the book also parallels more closely the organization of a attendant volume, Negotiation Readings, Exercises and Cases by Roy J. Lewicki. , David M. Saunders, and John W. Minton. Contents in Brief ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? The personality of negotiation Negotiations framing, strategizing, and planning system and evasive actions of divided negotiation scheme and tactical manoeuvres of integrative negotiation Communication, detection and cognitive biases Finding and using negotiation leverage moral philosophy in negotiation Global negotiation Managing difficult negotiations individual approaches Book Summary Assignment Essentials of Negotiation Chapter 1 The nature of negotiation The structure and processes of negotiation argon fundamentally the aforementi atomic number 53d(prenominal) at personal level as they argon at the diplomatical and corporate level. Negotiations occur for two reasons (1) to create something new that nevery companionship could do on his or her own, (2) to resolve a p roblem or dispute between the parties. thither atomic number 18 some(prenominal) characteristics common to all negotiation spotlights (1) at that place be two or ore parties, (2) there is a conflict of interest between them, (3) The parties negotiate duo to get a better deal (4) the parties, at least(prenominal) for a moment favour to search for agreement, (5) when they negotiate they expect to conduce and take, (6) undefeated negotiation touch ons the get it onment of intangibles ( lots(prenominal) as convey to look good) as well as re reply the tangibles ( much(prenominal) as the terms of agreement) In negotiations twain parties need each other. This situation of mutual dependency is called interdependence.Interdependent relationships are characterized by interlocking goals the parties need each other to accomplish their goals. The structure of the interdependence (wind-lose or win-win), determines the run away of snuff itable outcomes of the negotiation and sug gests the book strategies and tactics that the negotiators should give. Interdependent relationships are complex. some(prenominal) parties cope that they idler wreak the others outcomes and their outcomes in gaming be influenced by the other. This mutual adjustment continues throughout the negotiation as both parties act to influence the other.Making and interpreting concessions is no palmy gain, especially when there is little trust between negotiations. The search for an best solution through the processes of giving information and making concessions is greatly aid by trust and a belief that you are being hardened honesty and fairly. Two efforts in negotiation help to create much(prenominal) trust and belief perceptions of outcomes that attempts to change a callers mind of the perceived importance of something and perception of the process whitethorn help perplex images of equity, fairness and reciprocity in proposals and concessions. hotshot potential consequence of interdependent relationship is conflict that fanny be duo to the highly diverging necessarily of the two parties, a mis disposition that occurs between two people, or some other intangible f proletarians. One way to classify conflicts is by level, and four levels of conflicts are commonly identified intrapersonal conflict, interpersonal conflict, intra-group conflict, inter-group conflict. Conflict may be destructive or productive, so the objective is non to pooh-pooh conflict but to learn how to bed it so that the destructive elements are controlled while the productive aspects are enjoyed.Negotiation is a scheme for productively managing conflict. Many approaches to managing conflict flip been suggested. The down the stairs two dimensional archetypeling is represented as the dual lines model. The model postulates that individuals in conflict sustain two independent levels of worry concern about their own outcomes and concern about the others outcomes. As mention ed in the figure, there are five major Problem Yielding strategies for conflict management.Each schema has its Solving advantages and disadvantages and is more or less(prenominal) appropriate given the display case of conflict and situation in which (compromising) the dispute occurs. Thus, conflict theory and search have moved toward a contingency approach advocating that the Inaction Contending strategy selected should be based on the objectives of the parties and the nature of their dispute. Two major mechanisms for adjudicate conflicts- third base parties and Concern about own outcomes conflict management systems- extend in a higher place and beyond the strategies of the parties themselves.Concern about others utcomes 3 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of Negotiation Chapter 2 Negotiations framing, strategizing, and planning In this chapter, authors discuss what negotiators should do in set ahead sitting down at the table framing, strategizing, and planning. Framing is t he means by which the parties in a negotiation define the problem. They mention that there are three shipway to understand frames as cognitive heuristics, at categories of experience, and as a process of issue development.In continuation, they try to introduce the negotiator to the power and prevalence of frames via different types of frames, how certain frames may be invoked or ignored in a given situation, the consequences of framing a conflict in a particular way and the approaches that negotiators can use to manage frames more effectively. Understanding frames- which means understanding how parties define the key issues and how conversations can shift and transform those issues- is the first step in effective planning. aft(prenominal) framing, negotiators moldiness anticipate what they want to achieve in a negotiation and must prepare for these events in advance. The preparation must include prudence to substantive items including goals, goal priorities, and multi-goal package s as well as procedural concerns relations with agendas and bargaining histories. the choice of goals and frames are strongly interactive and the existence of one give rapidly produce evidence of other. Afterwards negotiators move to the third element in the sequence selecting and developing a strategy. tally to below suggested model, negotiators have some choices of a negotiation that is reflected in the answers to two fair questions how much concern does the actor have for achieving the substantive outcomes at pastime in this Substantive outcome important? negotiation and how much concern does the Yes No negotiator have for the current and future quality of relationship with the other party. Yes Collaboration Accommodation In the last part of chapter, authors let slay the importance of planning. hile success in negotiation is affected by how one plays the game, the just about important step for success is No Competition dodge how to one gets ready for the game. effective p lanning also hard work on a number of specific stairs ? Defining issues ? appeal issues and defining the bargaining mix ? Defining interests ? Consulting with others ? Identifying limits ? Setting sends ? Developing musical accompaniment arguments ? Analyzing the other party Frames, goals, strategies and stages set the background for an effective planning process.If the negotiator is able to consider and evaluate each of these eventors, the negotiator will know what he or she wants and will have a clear perceive of direction on how to proceed. The sense of direction, and the confidence derived from it will be the sensation most important factor in achieving a desired negotiation outcome. Rational choice important 4 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of Negotiation Chapter 3 Strategy and tactics of distributive negotiation In a distributive bargaining situation, the goals of one party are commonly in fundamental and direct conflict with the goals of the other party.Resources a re located and each party will use a set of strategies to profit their share of resources to be obtained. While distributive strategies are useful, they can also be counterproductive and costly. Often they cause the negotiating parties to focus so much on their differences that they ignore what they have in common. These negative effects notwithstanding, distributive bargaining strategies are quite useful when a negotiator wants to increase the value obtained in a single deal and when the relationship with the other party is not important.Both parties to a negotiation should establish their starting, target and metro even outs before beginning a negotiation. Starting points are normally in the opening arousements each party makes. The target point is commonly learned or inferred as negotiations get under way. The resi emplacement point, the point beyond which a person will not go and would substitutely break off negotiations. The spread between the disagreeance points, ca lled bargaining get, resolution range or zone of potential agreement, is oddly important.In this welkin the material bargaining takes place, for anything outside these point will be summarily rejected by one of the two negotiators. It is rare that a negotiation includes only one item more typically there is a set of items, referred to as a bargaining mix. Each item in a bargaining mix can have opening, target and eliminateance points. The bargaining mix may provide opportunities for bundling issues together, logrolling or displaying mutually concessionary behavior.Negotiators by employing strategies attempt to influence each other perceptions of what is possible through the exchange of information and persuasion. Regardless of the general strategy taken, two t aims are important in all distributive bargaining situations discovering the other partys resistance point and influencing the other partys resistance point. The negotiators basic goal is to reach a final settlement as c lose to the other partys resistance point as possible.Four tactical tasks are suggested for a negotiator in a distributive bargaining (1) to asses the other partys outcome values and the costs of terminating negotiations, (2) to manage the other partys impressions of the negotiators outcome values, (3) to modify the other partys perception of his or her own outcome values, and (4) to manipulate the actual costs of delaying or aborting negotiations. The other decision to be made at the outset of distributive bargaining concerns the stance to adopt during negotiations. A fair bargaining position is commonly coupled with a friendly stance and an extreme position is usually couple ith a tougher, more agonistical stance. A key concept in creating a bargaining position is that of commitment. The purpose of a commitment is to remove am abundantuity about the actors intended course of action. There are several(prenominal) ways to create a commitment public pronouncement, link with an outs ide ally, increase the prominence of demands, reinforce the treat or promise. There are a set of hardball tactics to beat the other party. Such tactics are designed to pressure targeted parties to do things they would not otherwise do, and their presence usually disguises the users adherence to a decidedly distributive bargaining approach.Some of them are good guy/bad guy, highball/lowball, bogey, the nibble, chicken, intimidation, aggressive behavior, demand by the nose job. The authors suggested three ways for responding to typical hardball tactics, including ignore them, discuss them and respond in kind. 5 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of Negotiation Chapter 4 Strategy and tactics of integrative negotiation In many negotiations there need not be winners and losers all parties can be winner. In integrative negotiation- conglomerately known as cooperative, collaborative, win-win, or problem solving- the goals of the parties are not mutually exclusive.The fundamental structu re of an integrative negotiation situation is such that it allows both sides to achieve their objectives. Integrative negotiation requires a process fundamentally different from that of distributive negotiation. Those wishing to achieve integrative results find that they must manage both the context and the process of the negotiation in tack to gain the spontaneous cooperation and commitment of all parties. The following processes tend to be central to achieving almost all integrative agreements ? creating a free scarper of information ? ttempting to understand the other negotiators real take and objectives ? emphasizing the commonalities between the parties and minimizing the difference ? searching for solutions that meet the goals and objectives of both sides There are four major steps in the integrative negotiation process 1. Identifying and defining the problem, ? define the problem in a way that is mutually acceptable to both sides ? keep the problem statement refreshful a nd simple ? state the problem as a goal and spot the obstacles to attaining this goal ? epersonalize the problem ? separate the problem definition from the search for solution 2. understanding the problem and finding interests and needs to the surface (focusing on interests will allow the parties to move beyond opening positions and demands to determine what the parties really want, what needs truly must be satisfied) 3. generating alternative solutions to the problem (tactics such as expand the pie, logroll, nonspecific compensation, cut the costs for compliance, find a link up solution 4.Evaluating those alternatives and selecting among them ? narrow the range of solution options ? agree to the criteria in advance of evaluating options ? evaluate solutions on the basis of quality and accept qualification ? be willing to justify personal preferences ? be alert to the influence of intangibles in selecting options ? use subgroups to evaluate complex issues ? take time out to cool off ? explore different ways to logroll ? keep decisions tentative and qualified until all aspects of the final proposals are complete ? inimize formality and record property until final agreements are closed Authors identified seven fundamental preconditions for successful integrative negotiation some form of shared or common goal, faith in ones own ability to solve problems, a belief in the validity and importance of the others position, the need and commitment to work together, trust in the opposing negotiator, the ability to accurately exchange information in spite of conflict conditions, and an understanding of how the process works. 6 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of NegotiationChapter 5 Communication, perception and cognitive biases Communication is at the heart of the negotiating process. This chapter focuses on the processes by which negotiators clear their own interests, positions, and goals and in turn make sense of those of the other party and of the negotiation as a whole. Weather the intent is to pedagogy and compel, sell, persuade or gain commitment, how parties communicate in negotiation would appear to depend on the ability of the speaker to encode the thoughts properly as well as on the ability of the listener to understand and decipher the intended messages.There are two critical sub-processes of communication perception and cognition. ? Perception is defined as the process of screening, selecting and interpreting stimuli so that they have meaning to the individual. The complexity of environments makes it impossible to process all of the available information, so perception becomes selective, focusing on some stimuli while turning out others. As a result people have several shortcuts in their perceptual systems that allow them to process information more readily.Unfortunately these shortcuts come with cost-perceptual errors such as stereotyping, halo effects, selective perception or projectionswhich typically occur without people being aware that they are happening. Stimulus management Recognition Translation Behavior Perception ? Rather than being everlasting(a) processors of information, negotiators have a tendency to make systematic errors when they process information. These errors, denominate cognitive biases, tend to impede negotiator performance the irrational escalation of commitment, mythical fixed pie belief, the process f anchoring and adjustment, issue and problem framing, negotiators overconfidence, the winners curse, self-serving biases, ignoring others cognitions, the law of small numbers and reactive devaluation. Failures and distortions in perception, cognition and communication are the most dominant contributors to breakdowns and failures in negotiations. Three important techniques have been proposed for improving communication in negotiation the use of questions, hearing and role reversal. 7 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of NegotiationChapter 6 Finding and using negotiation leve rage In this chapter, the authors focus on leverage in negotiation that means the tools negotiators can use to give themselves an advantage or increase the probability of achieving their own objectives. Leverage is oft apply synonymously with power. Authors explain three major sources of power information and expertise, control over resources, and location in an organizational structure and then point to the process for using power as an attempt to change the others position, view or perspective.During negotiations, actors frequently need to incline each other, influence the other partys positions, perceptions and opinions and for doing these they employ a group of tactics that are called persuasion. Authors consider four key elements of persuasion ways in which sources of information can be powerful, ways in which messages can be structured to be more powerful, ways in which targets of persuasion can enhance or reduce their power and ways in which the elements in social context can exert verificatory influence on the target.There are some ways in which to think about the key factors in the persuasion/ leverage process. One of them is shown in below figure. Message factors Resultant attitudes (positions) Initial attitudes (positions) ? Message confine ? Message Structure ? Persuasive style Source factor ? believability ? Attractiveness Target factors ? attending to the other ? Resisting the others arguments consideration factor Reciprocity, Commitment, Social proof, Use of reward and punishment, Scarcity Central bridle-path Peripheral Route ? ? ? ?Message factors or ways in which he content of the message can be structured and presented to enhance its strength Source factors or ways in which the sender of the message can enhance his or her credibility and attractiveness in order to make the message more believable or more friendly pass catcher factors or ways in which the receiver of the message can either shape and direct what the sender is communica ting or intellectually resist the persuasive effects of the message Context factors or elements inherent in the social structure (such as the relationship between the parties, the compass in which the message is sent or the amount time taken to communicate the message) that can determine whether a message is more or less likely to be received and complied with. There are at least three major things that you as the listener can do to resist the others influence efforts have a best alternative to a negotiated agreement (BATNA), make a public commitment (or get the other party to make one) and inoculate yourself against the others persuasive message. 8 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of Negotiation Chapter 7 Ethics in negotiation In this chapter authors explored the question of whether there are or should be accepted ethical standards for behavior in negotiation.Ethics are broadly applied social standards for what is right or wrong in a particular situation or a process for setting those standards. Ethics proceed from particular philosophies, which purport to (a) define the nature of the conception in which we live and (b) prescribe rules for living together. The authors present a model to help explain how a negotiator decides whether to employ one or more deceptive tactics. Intentions and motives for using deceptive tactics Consequences 1. Impact of tactic does it work? 2. Self-evaluation 3. Feedback and reaction from other negotiator, constituency and audiences Influence Situation Identification of range of influence tactics Selection and use of a deceptive tactic Explanation and JustificationDeception and disguise may take several forms in negotiation as follows misrepresentation of ones position to another party, bluffing, falsification (introduction of factually erroneous information), deception (collection of true and/or untrue arguments that leads the other party to the wrong conclusion) and selective disclosure or misrepresentation to constituencies. The authors predicted that (1) when motivated to be emulous and when expecting the other to be competitive the negotiator would see the marginally ethical tactics as appropriate and (2) when both parties were competitively motivated they would exhibit the greatest tendency to employ marginally ethical tactics. From the negotiators perspective the primary motivation to use a deceptive tactic is to gain a shipboard power advantage.Using these tactics then produces consequences the tactic may work (produce desired results) or not work people evaluate their own use of the tactics( asking themselves if they were satisfied with the results, and if using the tactic was personally acceptable) and people also may receive critical comments from the other negotiator from constituencies and from audiences. Those evaluative comments may serve to increase or decrease the use of similar tactics in the future. If using the tactic allows negotiators to attain rewarding outcomes that would be un available to them if they behaved ethically and if the unethical conduct is not punished by others the frequency of unethical conduct is likely to increase because the negotiator believes he or she can get away with it.Negotiators frequently overlook the fact that although unethical or expedient tactics may get them what they want in the short run these same tactics typically lead to diminished effectiveness in the long term. (Consequences of these tactics on the negotiators reputation and trustworthiness, other party retaliation and revenge) If negotiators think the other party is using deceptive tactics he/she can do the following acts Ask probing questions and recognize the tactic. 9 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of Negotiation Chapter 8 Global negotiation In this chapter authors examined various aspects of a growing field of negotiation that explores the complexities of negotiating across borders.Negotiators from different cultures (countries) use different negotiation stra tegies and communication patterns when negotiating intra-culturally than when negotiating cross-culturally. Two overall contexts have an influence on cross border negotiations the environmental context, includes forces in the environment that are beyond the control of either party but that influence the negotiations, and quick context, includes factors over which the negotiators have influence and some measure of control. To know more cultures, Hofstede suggested that there are four important dimensions that can be used to describe cultural differences power distance, individualism/collectivism, masculinity/femininity and uncertainty avoidance.Foster suggests that culture can influence global negations in several ways, including the definition of negotiation, the selection of negotiators, protocol, communication, time, risk propensity, groups versus individuals and the nature of agreements. The chapter concludes with a discussion of how to manage cultural differences when negotiat ing across borders. Weiss presented the options that people have when negotiating with someone from other culture. According to him, when choosing a strategy, negotiators should be aware of their own and the other partys cultures in general, understand the specific factors in the current relationship, and predict or try to influence the other partys approach.His suggested responsive strategies may be arranged into three groups, base on familiarity (low, moderate, high) that a negotiator has with the other partys culture. Within each group there are some strategies that the negotiator may use individually (unilateral strategies) and others that involve the participation of the other party (joint strategies). Low familiarity ? Employ agents or advisors (unilateral Strategy) ? bring in a mediator ? Induce the other party to use your approach Moderate familiarity ? Adapt to the other partys approach ? Coordinate adjustment High familiarity ? Embrace the other partys approach ? Improvise an approach ? Effect symphony 10 Book Summary Assignment Essentials of NegotiationChapter 9 Managing difficult negotiations individual approaches through any number of different avenues breakdowns in communication, escalation of anger and mistrust, polarization of positions and refusal to compromise, the topic of ultimatums or simply the inability to invent options that are satisfactory to both sides negotiations often hit an impasse. Productive dialogue stops. The parties may continue talk of the town but the communication is usually characterized by trying to sell or force ones own position, talking about others unreasonable position and uncooperative behavior or both. This chapter reviewed actions that the parties can take to return to a productive dialogue. In general there are five major conflict reduction strategies that can be applied in contentious situations 1.Reducing tension and managing the de-escalation of hostility (via methods such as tension release, acknowledg ment of the others feelings (active listening), separating the parties, synchronized de-escalation) 2. Enhancing communication, particularly improving each partys understanding of the others perspective (via methods such as role reversal or imaging) 3. autocratic the number and size of issues in the discussion ? Reduce the number of parties on each side ? control the number of substantive issues involved ? state issues in concrete terms rather than as general principles ? intimidate the precedents involved, both procedural and substantive ? search for ways to fractionate the big issues ? depersonalize issues separate them from the parties advocating them 4.Establishing a common ground on which the parties can find a basis for agreement (via methods such as find out super ordinate goals, clarifying common enemies, agreement on the rules and procedures) 5. Enhancing the dynamism of the options and alternatives that each party presents to the other (give the other party a yes-able proposal, ask for a different decision, sweeten the offer rather than intensify the threat, use legitimacy or objective criteria to evaluate solutions) The order of above steps is the one most frequently used by third parties in resolving disputes and hence we believe it also will be the most effective if employed by negotiators themselves. If the conflict cannot be controlled effectively, third-party intervention may become necessary. 11