Analysis of Articles Opposing American Aid to Columbia :: Government

Analysis of Articles Opposing American care to ColumbiaIn Are We Salvadorizing Colombia?, Garry M. bloodsucker claims that the current situation in Colombia is a replicate description of Salvador in the 1980s. He explains how the Clinton Administration imitated Ronal Regans Administration during the 1980s. Plan Colombia A Closer Look, also by Garry M. bloodsucker, claims that the aid given to Colombia by the US government will non end Colombias civil contend, retrieve the nations miserliness nor put the narco-traffickers out of business. The $1.3 billion aid package is divide, not to benefit the Colombian people but rather benefit the Colombians political and economic elite. In this essay, I will essay this two academic articles relative to the current political situation in Colombia and its direct simile with the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).Garry M. Leech is very detailed when pointing out evidence to avow his claims. He points out, in Are We Salvadorizing Colombia?, that during the 1980s the Regan Administration used the wintry War to apologise its support to the Salvadoran government while, the Clinton Administration used cocaine to disengage its support to the Colombian government. According to this article, the threat of drug administer in the US should not be confused with the current civil struggle in Colombia. He supports these arguments with historical evidence by stating that this civil war began as a fight for the repressive Colombian Government during the fifties meanwhile, the drug war began with the boom of cocaine in the 1970s. This evidence is again used in Plan Colombia A Closer Look to support Leechs claim that eliminating the violence related to drug mess will do little to solve the underlying political, social, and economical problems that acquit been the real cause of all the violence that has occurred throughout Colombian history. Leech assumes that the modern reader is aware of the mi sconceptions caused by the fear of communism during the Cold War. He relates this with the Colombian case, trying to sympathize with the reader, and making them believe that it is awry(p) approach to fight the drug war. Another important claim mentioned is the relation between the Colombian military and the paramilitaries therefore, the indirect relation with drug trade and human rights violation. In Plan Colombia A Closer Look, he states that 80% of the USAID package is going to the Colombian military and police force.